圣经与古兰经中的耶稣：对比

核心论证 Core Argument

古兰经和圣经都尊重耶稣，但给出了根本不同的画像。圣经中的耶稣是道成肉身的上帝（约翰福音1:14）、全人类的救赎主（约翰福音3:16）、死在十字架上又复活的主（哥林多前书15:3-4）。古兰经中的尔撒则仅是一位先知，不是神的儿子，没有被钉十字架，也没有复活。关键问题是：哪个记载更可靠？新约写于事件发生后20-60年，由目击者或目击者的同伴撰写。古兰经写于事件发生后约600年，由一个从未到过巴勒斯坦的人撰写。从历史学方法论来说，更接近事件的来源更可靠。

Both the Quran and the Bible honor Jesus, but paint fundamentally different portraits. The biblical Jesus is God incarnate (John 1:14), Savior of all humanity (John 3:16), who died on the cross and rose again (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). The Quranic Isa is merely a prophet, not the Son of God, was not crucified, and did not rise. The critical question: which account is more reliable? The NT was written 20-60 years after the events by eyewitnesses or their companions. The Quran was written about 600 years after the events by someone who never visited Palestine. By historical methodology, sources closer to events are more reliable.